[Metalab] Distributed Redundant Storage

[Markus Kienast]

I was more thinking in the GlusterFS direction. And actually, for me it
does not matter on which layer the replication and distribution takes place.

Could also be some http based distributed key value store. As long as it
scales and is fault tolerant.

Markus
Am 12.11.2012 21:54 schrieb "Philipp Marek" <philipp at marek.priv.at>:

> > Can anybody recommend a redundant replicated storage solution stable
> enough
> > to act as basis of production system?
> >
> > It will be used to store and serve video data to the web and to
> transcoding
> > nodes.
> >
> > Any recommendations?
> DRBD. With 8.4 you can have up to 4 nodes (with identical data) with
> stacking, with DRBD
> 9 you can get 3,4,5-way redundancy in a flat hierarchy.
>
> Very stable, OSS, included in standard Linux kernel since 2.6.33.
>
>
> Disclaimer: I work for LINBIT.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.metalab.at/pipermail/metalab/attachments/20121112/9f1bd778/attachment.html>