<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Jaume,<br>
<br>
We have some talks on 31.8 / 1.9.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://metalab.at/wiki/WirNennenEs30">http://metalab.at/wiki/WirNennenEs30</a><br>
<br>
one is by me on topic "semantic desktop", others by Grenzfurthner and
Magnus Wurzer, perhaps more.<br>
two ideas, independent of each other:<br>
<br>
A:<br>
are you interested in recording one of them, to test the equipment?<br>
<br>
record them, store, host them longer (or upload on google|youtube video)<br>
<br>
B:<br>
I have some friends in Kaiserslautern, who may want to follow the
event via video-stream,<br>
but we had only mediocre results so far using Skype or other
video-conferencing tools to connect parties,<br>
is icecast a solution here?<br>
<br>
this would mean live-streaming, a different issue that recording, but
also interesting in this setup.<br>
<br>
(connecting events could look like this, example from roböxotica):<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg5LtH6vezE">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg5LtH6vezE</a><br>
<br>
jaume schrieb:
<blockquote cite="mid46A76A6D.8000108@nualart.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Robert,
Robert Maier wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">i think a simple IP Webcam is better,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Better? mmm, in my opinion is radically not better.
The webcam streams is that kind of streams that nobody see because of
the bad quality. From my experience, perople don't follow to much video
streams coz molst of them are very bad video quality, bad lights in the
stage and impossible to understand the audio.
What I'm porposing is not to do stream, this is technically, really
easy. What I propose i to do a channel, and that requires audience.
People folow streams if they are sexy en off, in quality of contents,
and in quality of the emission (this is just my experience last years)
jaume
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">cheaper and
needs less energergy than a PC ;)
--- jaume <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jaume@nualart.com"><jaume@nualart.com></a> schrieb:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi all,
about the idea to do regular video transmissions
from metalab
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://metalab.at/wiki/MetalabTV">http://metalab.at/wiki/MetalabTV</a>
To start it is needed a computer, let's call it,
streambox.
I asked some people if there is any computer
available in metalab for this.
The main work that the computer should do is live
encoding using
ffmpeg2theora or Puredata patches. I'm not sure at
this moment about
minimal requeriments for the streambox, but maybe
could be a 2,4 Ghz
CPU / 512 RAM
That's all by the moment
jaume
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
Metalab mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Metalab@lists.metalab.at">Metalab@lists.metalab.at</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.metalab.at/mailman/listinfo/metalab">http://lists.metalab.at/mailman/listinfo/metalab</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>